跳到正文
PLOS Computational Biology· Kyle Morrison·· 3 天前AI 评分28

开发报告评估工具的十条简单规则

Ten simple rules for developing a reporting appraisal tool

AI 导读

针对报告指南虽有助于作者写作却不适合同行评审与编辑评估的问题,Kyle Morrison 与 Malgorzata Lagisz 提出开发"报告评估工具"——专门用于核查论文是否报告了研究最低必要要素的可操作工具,并给出十条简单规则指导其开发。

阅读原文

来源:PLOS Computational Biology · journals.plos.org

论文摘要

by Kyle Morrison, Malgorzata Lagisz

In an ideal world, authors would report clearly and transparently exactly what they conducted. In reality, reporting is often incomplete, and key elements of research conduct are frequently missing from manuscripts. Reporting guidelines were developed to address this problem by helping authors identify what should be reported. These guidelines have been highly valuable for authors, but they are not well suited for appraising reporting during peer review or editorial assessment despite common use. This is because authors and appraisers have different needs: authors require a comprehensive guide for writing, whereas appraisers need a tool that is concise, repeatable, and easy to use. We therefore propose the development of reporting appraisal tools: operationalised tools designed specifically to assess whether a paper has reported the minimum essential elements of a study. To support their development, we present 10 simple rules.